Why Am I Always Being Researched?
Chicago Beyond's guidebook on the power dynamics in research and evaluation between community organisations, researchers and funders. It names seven inequities held in place by power: access, information, validity, ownership, value, accountability and authorship. For each, it gives questions and tools that community organisations, researchers and funders can use to examine bias, share power and get closer to the truth about what works.
Keywords
How to cite
Chicago Beyond (2018). Why Am I Always Being Researched?. https://wp.chicagobeyond.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ChicagoBeyond_Why-Am-I.pdf
Related in the library
- 7.2C088
Contribution analysis
A 4-page brief that explains contribution analysis, a way to make a credible claim that a programme contributed to an observed change when an experiment or control group is not practical. It sets out how to test the programme's theory of change against evidence and consider other factors that may explain the outcome. Evaluators, programme staff and funders use it to plan and report on contribution claims.
ClassicShort readFree - 7.2C089
Outcome Harvesting
A brief that introduces outcome harvesting, a participatory method for identifying, verifying and making sense of outcomes when cause and effect are unclear. The evaluator collects evidence of what changed and works back to assess whether and how the intervention contributed. It explains the core concepts and steps. Evaluators and teams use it for advocacy, policy and other complex work where results cannot be set in advance.
ClassicKey manual or guideFree - 7.2C090
The 'Most Significant Change' (MSC) Technique
The core manual for the Most Significant Change technique, a participatory monitoring method based on collecting and selecting stories of change. It sets out 10 steps, from defining domains of change and collecting stories to selecting, verifying and feeding back results, plus secondary analysis. It discusses where MSC fits, its limits and how to combine it with other methods. M&E staff and facilitators use it to run MSC.
ClassicKey manual or guideFree - 7.2C091
A Developmental Evaluation Companion
A 70-page guide to developmental evaluation for people working on new or fast-changing initiatives and the funders who back them. After a foreword by Michael Quinn Patton, it has 3 sections: introducing developmental evaluation, grappling with its challenges, and designing one. It follows Gamble's earlier primer. Evaluators, innovators and funders use it to decide whether developmental evaluation fits and how to set one up.
CurrentKey manual or guideFree - 7.2C092
BetterEvaluation
A free knowledge platform and community on evaluation. Its Rainbow Framework groups monitoring and evaluation methods and processes into 7 tasks. The site has pages on evaluation methods, approaches and themes, a manager's guide to evaluation, a searchable resource library, and directories of training and academic programmes. Evaluators, commissioners and programme staff use it to choose and apply methods. It is part of the Global Evaluation Initiative.
Start hereCurrentKey online resourceFree - 7.4C096
Feedback Resources
A resource page from Feedback Labs that groups tools for listening to the people organisations serve into 3 stages. Getting started includes research, a feedback tools repository and funder listening guides. Establishing practice includes the Feedback Quiz, a crash course and Listen4Good's step-by-step guide to equity-centred feedback. Later resources include LabStorms, a fellowship and a conversation deck. Nonprofits and funders use it to build feedback loops.
Start hereCurrentKey online resourceFree - 7.4C097
Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability
The 2024 revision of the Core Humanitarian Standard, launched in March 2024 after a 2-year consultation with more than 4,000 contributors in over 90 countries. It sets out 9 commitments to people and communities affected by crises and can be used by any person or organisation that supports them. Organisations use it to check their own practice and as the basis for verification. The booklet comes in 17 languages.
CurrentKey manual or guideFree - 7.4C098
Happy Beneficiaries
A 3-question pulse survey that measures beneficiary satisfaction in about 2 minutes. It asks how likely people are to recommend the organisation, why they gave that score and what could improve. Nonprofits run it continuously at events, after services or at other contact points, then read an AI-written report with scores and suggested actions. Use is free with sign-up.
EmergingTool or templateFree with sign-upNonprofit Builder tool
Related project ideas
Get expert help with monitoring, evaluation and learning
Consulting and coaching projects built from 600+ real projects. Pick one, add your needs and hear from vetted consultants.
Data collection tool design & implementation
“Your team uses a patchwork of spreadsheets, paper forms, and ad hoc surveys — data is incomplete, inconsistent, and impossible to aggregate.”See project
Data visualisation for impact reporting
“You have the data but it sits in spreadsheets — your reports are walls of text and numbers that fail to communicate what you have actually achieved.”See project
All 7 Monitoring, evaluation & learning project ideas
Work with a consultant or coach
Nonprofit Builder members can browse vetted consultants and coaches who work on monitoring, evaluation and learning, and invite them to a project.
Suggestion box
Something to fix or add here?
Know a better resource on this subject, found a broken link, or spotted a mistake in this record? Tell us.
About C237 Why Am I Always Being Researched?
A person reads every message. A title, a link or a few words is enough.