Centering Equity in Collective Impact
An article from the Winter 2022 issue of Stanford Social Innovation Review in which the authors of the collective impact approach revisit it with equity at the centre. It sets out 5 strategies: use local data and context to aim solutions, pursue systems change alongside programmes, share power within the collaborative, listen to and act with the community, and build equity-focused leadership and accountability. Coalitions and funders use it to review their own collective impact work.
Keywords
How to cite
John Kania, Junious Williams, Paul Schmitz, Sheri Brady, Mark Kramer, Jennifer Splansky Juster (2022). Centering Equity in Collective Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/centering_equity_in_collective_impact
Related in the library
- 10.1C129
The State of Network Evaluation
A framing paper for funders, network leaders and evaluators who want to assess networks for social change. It explains why networks matter, what makes them distinct, which parts of a network can be evaluated, and which designs, questions and methods fit. It closes on challenges for the field. A companion casebook from Network Impact, Evaluating Networks for Social Change, describes real funder-led network evaluations and their results.
ClassicKey manual or guideFree - 10.1C130
Catalyzing Networks for Social Change
A guide for grantmakers who want to work with a network mindset. It describes 5 network approaches: weave social ties, access diverse perspectives, build and share knowledge openly, create infrastructure for wide engagement, and coordinate resources and action. Later sections cover how foundations can cultivate networks, the roles they can play, a tool on traits of a healthy network, and how to assess network impact. It ends with resources and a glossary.
ClassicKey manual or guideFree - 10.1C131
Net Gains
A handbook by Peter Plastrik and Madeleine Taylor for people who build and run networks for social change. It covers how such networks form, grow and are managed, and it shares lessons on using networks to reach large-scale impact. Network coordinators, members and funders use it to plan a network's design, growth and coordination, and to compare their own experience with others.
Start hereClassicKey manual or guideFree - 10.1C133
Impact Networks
A 216-page book by David Ehrlichman for people who start, lead or fund networks of organisations working on complex problems. It covers how to build connection and trust among members, coordinate action, share governance and support self-organisation. The linked page is an excerpt on self-organisation published by Stanford Social Innovation Review. Network leaders use the book as a practical reference for running a network.
CurrentKey manual or guideBook - 10.1C134
User Guide: Network Mapping
A short user guide to network mapping, also called social network analysis, for nonprofits and funders. It explains how to measure and map the relationships between people or organisations in a network, usually shown as a map of entities and their links. It shows how positions and groupings in the map reveal the roles members play and how information moves between them. Teams use it to plan a first mapping exercise.
CurrentTool or templateFree - 2.5C207
Big Enough. Simple Enough. Cheap Enough.
A short article by Kevin Starr of the Mulago Foundation on how to judge whether a solution can scale. Real scale usually depends on a "doer" and a "payer" other than the founding organisation, often government. Starr tests each model three ways: is the market big enough, is it simple enough for the doer to deliver, and is it cheap enough for the payer, benchmarked against what payers already spend. Founders use it to redesign models before scaling.
CurrentShort readFree - 4.3C053
Making Founder Successions Work
An article from the Spring 2018 issue of Stanford Social Innovation Review, republished by Bridgespan. It questions the common advice that a founder should make a clean break when stepping down. The authors argue that many nonprofits gain when they plan a deliberate, bounded ongoing role for the departing founder. Boards, founders and successors use it to discuss what role the founder should keep and how to set its limits.
ClassicShort readFree - 6.2C078
Trust, Rest, and Joy
A short article from the Spring 2024 issue of SSIR, in a supplement sponsored by the Trust-Based Philanthropy Project. Leaders from the Durfee and Satterberg foundations describe how they fund rest: Durfee's sabbaticals since 1997 and its Lark Awards for staff wellbeing, and Satterberg's support for a BIPOC executive director sabbatical and retreat programme. It discusses who gets to rest and why funders need to trust grantees on what restores them.
CurrentShort readFree with sign-up
Related project ideas
Get expert help with networks and partnerships
Consulting and coaching projects built from 600+ real projects. Pick one, add your needs and hear from vetted consultants.
Systems thinking workshop
“You keep solving the same problems over and over because you are addressing symptoms rather than root causes.”See project
Theory of change development & facilitation
“You believe your work creates change, but you've never written down why or how — and funders keep asking for it.”See project
All 11 Strategy & strategic planning project ideas All 9 Organisational development project ideas
Work with a consultant or coach
Nonprofit Builder members can browse vetted consultants and coaches who work on networks and partnerships, and invite them to a project.
Suggestion box
Something to fix or add here?
Know a better resource on this subject, found a broken link, or spotted a mistake in this record? Tell us.
About C132 Centering Equity in Collective Impact
A person reads every message. A title, a link or a few words is enough.